Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials

Original Submission
25 Apr 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
19 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philipp Dahm
3 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
11 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting
28 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
2 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting
25 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting
25 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
5 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-11

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page