Peer Review reports
From: Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Shrier |
| 12 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell |
| 7 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud |
| 17 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Glasziou |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 7 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Shrier |
| 26 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud |
| 25 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Glasziou |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Glasziou |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-23 |
You can find further information about peer review here.