Peer Review reports
From: A graphical vector autoregressive modelling approach to the analysis of electronic diary data
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emil Kupek |
| 14 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Tschacher |
| 17 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wes Thompson |
| 13 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Beate Wild |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Tschacher |
| 27 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emil Kupek |
| 12 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Beate Wild |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.