Peer Review reports
From: Testing for heterogeneity among the components of a binary composite outcome in a clinical trial
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
8 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Borm |
10 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Albert |
27 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Janice Pogue |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Borm |
10 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
23 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Albert |
8 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Janice Pogue |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Albert |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
31 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Janice Pogue |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
3 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Janice Pogue |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
3 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
7 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.