Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Original Submission
4 Feb 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard macLehose
7 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Gustafson
28 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - C. Elizabeth McCarron
Resubmission - Version 2
28 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Gustafson
21 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard macLehose
30 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - C. Elizabeth McCarron
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
9 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-64

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page