Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Response rates to a mailed survey of a representative sample of cancer patients randomly drawn from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry: a randomized trial of incentive and length effects

Original Submission
9 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
25 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl
30 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy Beebe
4 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Phil Edwards
31 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
20 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy Beebe
27 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Phil Edwards
28 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
20 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 4
20 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
11 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Kelly
Resubmission - Version 9
11 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
14 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
14 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-65

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page