Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Behrens |
10 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd |
4 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
4 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
13 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
13 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
14 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
14 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
15 Jul 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jul 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-66 |
You can find further information about peer review here.