Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression

Original Submission
6 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Reichenheim
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Behrens
10 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd
4 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Reichenheim
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Reichenheim
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Reichenheim
Resubmission - Version 7
4 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
13 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Reichenheim
Resubmission - Version 8
13 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
14 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Michael Reichenheim
Resubmission - Version 10
14 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
15 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
15 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-66

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page