Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Sawchuk |
21 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Valentiner |
21 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Soeren Paul |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Sawchuk |
23 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Valentiner |
22 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Soeren Paul |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Valentiner |
13 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Sawchuk |
1 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Soeren Paul |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Valentiner |
26 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Soeren Paul |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
18 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Soeren Paul |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
20 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-95 |
You can find further information about peer review here.