Peer Review reports
From: The case study approach
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Bigby |
| 25 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
| 26 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine |
| 19 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
| 17 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 17 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine |
| 3 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 31 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 31 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100 |
You can find further information about peer review here.