Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Developing a predictive tool for psychological well-being among Chinese adolescents in the presence of missing data

Original Submission
21 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Linden
29 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Berend Terluin
19 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Henry Lynn
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Henry Lynn
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Linden
18 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Henry Lynn
Resubmission - Version 5
18 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Berend Terluin
17 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Henry Lynn
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Berend Terluin
19 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Henry Lynn
Resubmission - Version 7
19 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
19 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-119

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page