Peer Review reports
From: One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugene Demidenko |
7 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy |
17 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Lunt |
26 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
7 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eugene Demidenko |
12 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
22 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy |
8 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
18 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.