Peer Review reports
From: A proposed method to investigate reliability throughout a questionnaire
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aaron Maitland |
29 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Ploubidis |
22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Are Hugo Pripp |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aaron Maitland |
22 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Ploubidis |
2 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Are Hugo Pripp |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
3 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Are Hugo Pripp |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
3 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
5 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-137 |
You can find further information about peer review here.