Peer Review reports
From: A proposed method to investigate reliability throughout a questionnaire
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aaron Maitland |
| 29 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Ploubidis |
| 22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Are Hugo Pripp |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aaron Maitland |
| 22 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Ploubidis |
| 2 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Are Hugo Pripp |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 3 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Are Hugo Pripp |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 3 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-137 |
You can find further information about peer review here.