Peer Review reports
From: Conducting Online Expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petter Andreas Steen |
5 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
16 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
28 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petter Andreas Steen |
5 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
23 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174 |
You can find further information about peer review here.