Skip to main content

Table 3 Feature Importance to the Definition of a CQI Initiative and Agreement between Panels

From: Conducting Online Expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study

Features

Panel A,

Phase I

Panel B,

Phase I

Panel C,

Phase I

Panel D,

Phase I

Total,

Phase I

Panel A,

Phase III

Panel B,

Phase III

Panel C,

Phase III

Panel D,

Phase III

Total,

Phase III

Feature 1

14

93.3%

.53

12

100%

.25

30

90.9%

.39

30

96.8%

.45

86

94.5%

.42

10

100%

.3

10

100%

.2

32

97%

.24

26

100%

.27

78

98.7%

.25

Feature 2

13

92.9%

.57

6

50%

.92

28

82.4%

.71

21

67.7%

.87

68

74.7%

.77

9

90%

.6

5

50%

.8

28

84.8%

.64

18

69.2%

.89

60

75.9%

.69

Feature 3

8

57.1%

1

5

41.7%

.92

20

58.8%

1.03

16

51.6%

.97

49

53.8%

1.01

5

50%

.8

1

10%

.3

19

59.4%

.91

16

59.3%

.85

41

51.9%

.94

Feature 4

13

92.9%

.5

6

50%

1.17

25

3.5%

7 .91

26

74.2%

.94

67

73.6%

.97

8

80%

.6

6

60%

.6

28

84.8%

.73

24

88.9%

.63

66

82.5%

.75

Feature 5

6

42.9%

1.14

7

58.3%

1.08

18

54.5%

1

19

61.3%

.68

50

55.6%

.94

5

50%

.8

7

70%

.8

23

71.9%

.69

15

55.6%

.59

50

63.3%

.68

Feature 6

11

84.6%

1.21

9

75%

.75

30

88.2%

.62

27

87.1%

.74

77

85.6%

.77

9

90%

.5

9

90%

.4

29

90.6%

.47

24

88.9%

.52

71

89.9%

.51

Feature 7

11

78.6%

1

9

75%

.58

27

79.4%

.68

28

90.3%

.55

75

82.4%

.67

8

80%

.9

9

90%

.5

25

75.8%

.73

26

96.3%

.52

68

85%

.65

Feature 8

6

46.2%

1.15

8

66.7%

.92

20

58.8%t

1.03

22

71%

.77

56

62.2%

.96

6

66.7%

.67

7

70%

.7

21

63.6%

.76

18

66.7%

.85

52

65.8%

.77

Feature 9

11

84.6%

.46

10

83.3%

.58

N/A

28

90.3%

.48

49

87.5%

.58

10

100%

.1

10

100%

.4

18

62.1%

.79

26

96.3%

.37

64

84.2%

.73

Feature 10

9

64.3%

1.07

6

50%

.92

14

41.2%

1.38

16

51.6%

1.23

45

49.5%

1.27

4

40%

1.2

3

30%

.6

9

28.1%

1.06

13

48.1%

1.48

29

36.7%

1.05

Feature 11

13

92.9%

.71

8

66.7%

1.17

22

75.9%

.83

23

74.2%

.84

66

76.7%

.92

10

100%

.5

6

60%

1

26

81.3%

.59

19

70.4%

.78

61

77.2%

.82

  1. (Frequencies, % of responses higher than 3 on a 1-5 importance scale, MAD-M)
  2. Question: How important is this feature to the definition of a CQI initiative? Response scale: 1 = Not Important - 5 = Very Important
  3. Cells with bold font indicate panels where the majority (> 66.6%) of participants think that this feature is important for the definition of CQI.
Back to article page

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

Contact us