Peer Review reports
From: Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker |
| 21 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Viechtbauer |
| 14 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeppe Bennekou Schroll |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 2 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker |
| 3 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Viechtbauer |
| 13 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeppe Bennekou Schroll |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeppe Bennekou Schroll |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-22 |
You can find further information about peer review here.