Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: FORM: An Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines

Original Submission
10 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yngve Falck-Ytter
11 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shiffman
14 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Brozek
27 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hillier
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shiffman
16 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Brozek
17 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yngve Falck-Ytter
6 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hillier
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shiffman
5 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Brozek
8 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hillier
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hillier
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Hillier
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-23

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page