Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Lodi |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Lodi |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arja Helin-Salmivaara |
| 20 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gabriel Chodick |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Lodi |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arja Helin-Salmivaara |
| 28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gabriel Chodick |
| 4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Lodi |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Lodi |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-36 |
You can find further information about peer review here.