Skip to main content

Table 2 Two examples of summaries of screening specifications representing diversity of provider views

From: Developing the clinical components of a complex intervention for a glaucoma screening trial: a mixed methods study

Screen location

Screen operator

Target population

Screen tests

Criteria for screen positive

Diagnostic site for screen positives

Diagnostic assessor

Diagnostic test

Community (General Practice or optometry, or van in remote areas)

Optometrist or technician

60

Tonometry [GAT] + nerve fibre layer imaging [expressed preference for GDx as the nerve fibre layer imaging analysis technology] + perimetry [expressed a preference for Humphrey 24-2 and a strong dislike of FDT] ± anterior chamber depth [UBM].

Didn't say

Virtual clinic: Information from screen positives read by consultant ophthalmologist

Consultant ophthalmologist [strong dislike of this expert job being done by dedicated technicians, nurses, nurse consultants]

Reading of screen test information and then either discharged, retest or those reading positive referred for full standard care glaucoma work up and decision regarding treatment.

General Practice health centre

Nurse/technician or GP or self testing

50 but younger for African Caribbean ethnic groups

Ideally simple visual function test taking 2-3 minutes on laptop computer [Motion Detection Perimetry] and tonometry

Difficult to determine a cut -off threshold for IOP

HES

Expert

Full Glaucoma workup

  1. HES: Hospital Eye Service IOP: Intraocular pressure GDx: Scanning laser perimetry
  2. FDT: Frequency Doubling Technology UBM: Ultrasound biomicroscopy GAT: Goldmann Applanation Tonometry