Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Raphael Ritti-Dias |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - G. Matthew Longo |
15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paramjit Gill |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Raphael Ritti-Dias |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - G. Matthew Longo |
20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paramjit Gill |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paramjit Gill |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paramjit Gill |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
1 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paramjit Gill |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
1 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
3 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-85 |
You can find further information about peer review here.