Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Pumford |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nan Rothrock |
13 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marinka Twilt |
24 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Pumford |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Pumford |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nan Rothrock |
24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Pumford |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
13 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Pumford |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-91 |
You can find further information about peer review here.