Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rhonda Small |
| 22 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ali Montazeri |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Adam Carle |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrea Meyer |
| 12 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rochelle tractenberg |
| 20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rochelle tractenberg |
| 16 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Adam Carle |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 18 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Reichenheim |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 18 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-93 |
You can find further information about peer review here.