Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 7 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pim Kuipers |
| 3 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels Smits |
| 17 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Morten Aa. Petersen |
| 16 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Resnik |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 17 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels Smits |
| 24 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pim Kuipers |
| 22 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Morten Aa. Petersen |
| 3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Resnik |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 8 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Niels Smits |
| 6 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Resnik |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 6 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 6 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Resnik |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 6 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-145 |
You can find further information about peer review here.