Table 7 Correspondence between the concepts used in this paper and three reviews
Reviews | Dane and Schneider [[2]] | Dusenbury et al. [[1]] | Durlak et al. [[3]] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Legrand et al. | ||||
Intervention dose | Integrity or Fidelity including 5 components : exposure, adherence, quality of delivery, programme differentiation, participant responsiveness | Fidelity including 5 components: adherence, dose, quality of delivery, programme differentiation, participant responsiveness | Including 8 coas mponents:Fidelity, Dosage, Quality, Participant responsiveness, Programme differentiation, Contamination, Programme reach, Programme modification | |
Delivery | Quantity | Exposure | Dose | Dosage |
Fidelity (a k a : adherence or compliance or integrity, or faithful replication) | ||||
Adherence | Adherence | |||
Quality | Quality of delivery, Adherence | Quality of delivery, Adherence | Quality | |
Participation | Quantity | Participant responsiveness | Participant responsiveness | Programme reach |
Quality | Participant responsiveness | Participant responsiveness | Participant responsiveness | |
Participants/ sources of information | Supervisors | Supervisors, | ||
Developers | ||||
Facilitators | ||||
Anchors personnel (providers / receivers) | Implementers (receivers) or providers | Providers | Providers | |
Targets | Participants | |||
IRG | / | / | / | |
Indicators | Non-programme-driven activities | / | / | / |
Programme-driven activities | / | / | / | |