Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening

Original Submission
28 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
23 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martina Vandebroek
30 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Axel C. Mühlbacher
5 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Celia Berchi
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
25 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martina Vandebroek
20 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Axel C. Mühlbacher
14 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Celia Berchi
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
20 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-15

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\