Skip to main content

Table 1 Number (%) of authors (n=1116) whose authorship statement could be matched to ICMJE criteria

From: Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal

Criteria

No. (%) of authors*

Full criteria (1 and 2 and 3)

174 (15.6)

Criteria 1 and 2 not 3

431 (38.6)

Criteria 1 and 3 not 2

26 (2.3)

Criteria 2 and 3 not 1

17 (1.5)

Criterion 1 only:

355 (31.8)

 “conception”

12 (3.4)

 “design”

13 (3.7)

 “acquisition of data”

161 (45.3)

 “analysis of data”

24 (6.8)

 “interpretation of data”

9 (2.5)

 any 2 contributions

92 (25.9)

 any 3 contributions

34 (9.6)

 any 4 contributions

9 (2.5)

 all 5 contributions

1 (0.3)

Criterion 2 only:

105 (9.4)

 “drafting of the article”

45 (42.8)

 “revising of the article”

49 (46.7)

 both contributions

11 (10.5)

Criterion 3 only

5 (0.5)

Statement: “Because I contributed to the submitted article as an author according to the ICMJE criteria”

3 (0.3)

  1. *Percentages for contributions specified in an individual authorship criterion are to the total sum of responses within that criterion.