Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparing multiple competing interventions in the absence of randomized trials using clinical risk-benefit analysis

Original Submission
22 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo
20 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Slobodan Jankovic
27 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Shoukri
28 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Javier Mar
15 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Shoukri
20 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Javier Mar
11 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo
7 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 Jan 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page