Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Levine |
| 1 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cody Ding |
| 19 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
| 18 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Stochl |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cody Ding |
| 20 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
| 14 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Stochl |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
| 2 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Stochl |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-74 |
You can find further information about peer review here.