Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: A case study

Original Submission
29 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fujian Song
23 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmad Hazem
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Felicity Goodyear-Smith
23 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fujian Song
24 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmad Hazem
Resubmission - Version 4
23 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Resubmission - Version 7
24 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
24 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Resubmission - Version 8
24 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
12 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-76

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page