Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Summary of themes and suggested solutions

From: Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: lessons learned and recommendations for health services research

Key theme Issues arising Approach used/suggested solutions
Ethical issues: participant Recruitment shortly after significant diagnosis Treating doctor assessed participant prior to approach by researcher.
Approached participants sensitively in order to build trust and develop relationships over long term
  Blurring of boundaries as relationships develop Agreed plans to manage participant initiated contact about e.g. their treatment or health status (researchers did not give advice but referred participant to relevant health professional)
  Potential for patients to become unwell or die during study Written distress policy for participants and the research team in place
Ongoing consent recorded over the life of the project
Ethical issues: researcher Developing relationships over time Prepared researchers to manage difficult topics and emotions during the interview, and how management might change as relationships deepen
Closure of relationships
Developed a supportive network for researchers (e.g. debriefing sessions post interview)
  Confidentiality – and sharing data over large research teams Written procedures for managing ad-hoc or informal contacts with participants.
Developed clear data transfer and management plans
  Management of participant fatigue in interviews Ensure as the interview schedule changes due to new emerging topics that it is not over burdensome. Find new ways to ask questions to avoid repetition (do not merely add more questions)
Involvement of service users in study design
Recruitment and retention of participants Some groups of patients had high levels of attrition due to natural history of disease Checked health status of participants before contacting them prior to next interview to ensure this was done sensitively
Careful thought should be given to heterogeneity of the sample. The time points at which data is collected may have to be managed differently for sub-groups
Time At what time points should data be collected? We made a pragmatic decision about this and time points were the same for all participants.
It may be more relevant to identify time points by key transitions in the patient’s journey or by consideration of previous literature or informed by theory
  Time should be explicitly included in the interview – to include changing illness perceptions Looking forwards and backwards in interviews moves away from linear notions of time
Encourage reflexivity in the participant as well as the researcher
Asking participants to reflect on their experience from the previous interview
Data collection and management of resources Management of time and resources – when working with a large data set Ensure adequate time is included in project plans for project management and communication with participants
  Funding for LQR Work with the funding bodies to consider LQR
  Research focus and topic guide evolves over time Flexibility, openness and responsiveness to the data and emerging analysis and interpretation is a key skill for the LQR researcher
Ask for advice about how to manage this from an ethics committee
Analyzing data LQR data sets are large and complex and can be analyzed in multiple ways from different perspectives Ensure adequate time to analyze data between interviews – even if analysis is preliminary
Consider analysis of data within each case and as comparison between cases
Consider if and how subgroups should be analysed – is there a strong theoretical or practical reason why some groups should be analysed separately?
Consider the contribution of a number of different analysis strategies to the data and their strengths and weaknesses
Consider analysing data in a number of different ways, to add alternative understandings of longitudinal data