Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods

Original Submission
10 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller
4 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
4 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Pfeiffer
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
21 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Pfeiffer
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
1 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller
29 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\