Peer Review reports
From: External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller |
4 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
4 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Pfeiffer |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller |
26 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
26 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Pfeiffer |
28 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
1 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller |
11 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Patrick Royston |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
13 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
15 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.