Skip to main content

Table 5 Assignment to E or U sub-model in the simulation study

From: Using Bonferroni, BIC and AIC to assess evidence for alternative biological pathways: covariate selection for the multilevel Embryo-Uterus model

AIC/BIC difference

Expected (Raftery’s)

Sample size

400

800

1600

3200

6400

0-2

50-75%

59.3%

60.4%

61.1%

62.9%

64.9%

2-6

75-95%

82.3%

85.4%

86.4%

86.5%

87.1%

6-10

95-99%

96.2%

97.3%

97.8%

97.5%

97.9%

>10

>99%

99.4%

99.8%

99.2%

100.0%

100.0%

  1. Proportion of correct classifications using the AIC/BIC in terms of the observed BIC difference between models. The proportions shown are averaged over all the scenarios considered in Tables 3 and 4. The expected proportions of Raftery are also listed for these differences as a reference.