Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of participants

From: Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial

  

Abstract without limitations n (%)

Abstract with limitations n (%)

Total n (%)

N = 150

N = 150

N = 300

Qualification

MD

78 (52.0)

78 (52.0)

156 (52.0)

 

PhD

58 (38.7)

64 (42.7)

122 (40.7)

 

Other

14 (9.3)

8 (5.3)

22 (7.3)

Clinical experience

<5 years

6 (4.0)

8 (5.3)

14 (4.7)

 

5 to 10 years

34 (22.7)

28 (18.7)

62 (20.7)

 

>10 years

110 (73.3)

114 (76.6)

224 (74.7)

Reading reports of systematic reviews

Rarely or sometimes

61 (40.7)

62 (41.6)

123 (41.1)

 

Regularly

89 (59.3)

87 (58.4)

176 (58.9)

No. of randomized trials involved in

0

16 (10.7)

11 (7.3)

27 (9.0)

 

1–3

48 (32.0)

48 (32.0)

96 (32.0)

 

4–9

45 (30)

54 (36.0)

99 (33.0)

 

>10

41 (27.3)

37 (24.7)

78 (26.0)

Authored at least one systematic review

 

77 (51.3)

82 (55.0)

159 (53.2)

No. of systematic reviews peer-reviewed

0

75 (50.0)

64 (43.0)

139 (46.5)

 

1–3

55 (36.7)

69 (46.3)

124 (41.5)

 

>3

20 (13.3)

16 (10.7)

36 (12.0)

Training in clinical epidemiology

 

101 (67.3)

76 (50.7)

177 (59.0)

Training in methods of randomized trials

 

86 (57.3)

71 (47.3)

157 (52.3)