Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of systematic reviews included

From: Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial

Characteristics

 

N = 30

Field of research, n (%)

Medicine

27 (90)

 

Surgery

3 (10)

Impact factor, median; [Q1-Q3]; (min-max)

 

4.60; [3.18–7.51]; (0.00-18.04)

No. of trials included, median; [Q1-Q3]; (min-max)

 

13; [6–23]; (4–54)

Sample size, median; [Q1-Q3]; (min-max)

 

2872; [801–11005]; (257–782460)

Experimental treatment, n (%)

Drugs

16 (53)

 

Complex intervention

11 (37)

 

Surgery

2 (7)

 

Device

1 (3)

Meta-analysis included in the systematic review, n (%)

 

26 (87)

Funding source, n (%)

Non-profit

11 (37)

 

For-profit

2 (7)

 

None

10 (33)

 

Not specified

7 ((23)

Content of the original abstract, n (%)

Eligibility criteria

17 (57%)

 

Key data bases and date of search

9 (30%)

 

Method to assess the risk of bias

6 (20%)

 

No. and type of the studies included in the systematic review

22 (73%)

 

Summary measure and confidence interval for the main outcome results*

20/26 (77%)

 

Strength and limitation

13 (43%)

  1. *This result applies on the 26 systematic reviews that included a meta-analysis.