Peer Review reports
From: Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Dec 2001 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Jan 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter Devillé |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Jan 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
5 Mar 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter |
12 Mar 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Mant |
22 May 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter Devillé |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 May 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
22 May 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Walter Devillé |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 May 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Jun 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter |
27 Jun 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Mant |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
3 Jul 2002 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Jul 2002 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.