Peer Review reports
From: Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Jul 2002 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 8 Sep 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 13 Sep 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer |
| 6 Nov 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Antje Timmer |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Nov 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Nov 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer |
| 10 Dec 2002 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 18 Jan 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Antje Timmer |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Jan 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Jan 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 6 Feb 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Antje Timmer |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Feb 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Feb 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Feb 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-3-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.