Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

Original Submission
25 Apr 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
28 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Jose Struchiner
10 Jun 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james DEDDENS
7 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Aug 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james DEDDENS
11 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Jose Struchiner
18 Sep 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Sep 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james DEDDENS
11 Oct 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Oct 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Oct 2003 Editorially accepted
20 Oct 2003 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page