Peer Review reports
From: "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Jul 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Jul 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl |
| 24 Aug 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - keith meadows |
| 8 Sep 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petra Boynton |
| 27 Sep 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - keith meadows |
| 4 Nov 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 4 Nov 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Nov 2004 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Nov 2004 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-4-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.