Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Sep 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle |
8 Sep 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Gillespie |
23 Sep 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesco Paolo Schena |
2 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Borsody |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Borsody |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle |
20 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Gillespie |
28 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesco Paolo Schena |
17 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Borsody |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Borsody |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
2 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Borsody |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
3 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Borsody |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
3 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
7 Feb 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Feb 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-5-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.