Peer Review reports
From: Reviewer agreement trends from four years of electronic submissions of conference abstract
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager |
| 1 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Shashok |
| 23 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 6 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager |
| 6 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Shashok |
| 10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 6 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 6 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.