Peer Review reports
From: Scratch lottery tickets are a poor incentive to respond to mailed questionnaires
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michele Doody |
| 16 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Vilh Finsen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 16 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Vilh Finsen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michele Doody |
| 17 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vilh Finsen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 17 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vilh Finsen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 6 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vilh Finsen |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 6 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Apr 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Apr 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.