Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Sampson |
| 21 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kay Dickersin |
| 12 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Hannah Kuper |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 27 May 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Sampson |
| 29 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kay Dickersin |
| 3 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Hannah Kuper |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Hannah Kuper |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hannah Kuper |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 9 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hannah Kuper |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 9 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 27 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Hannah Kuper |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 27 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Feb 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Feb 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.