Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

Original Submission
27 Feb 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
2 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
2 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Campbell
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jul 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
4 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
23 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Campbell
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jul 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
16 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Sep 2006 Editorially accepted
11 Sep 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-44

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\