Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Harrison |
| 10 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Allison |
| 22 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Kenyon |
| 21 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Nakash |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Nakash |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 5 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Harrison |
| 6 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Kenyon |
| 8 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Allison |
| 7 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Nakash |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Nakash |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Feb 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Feb 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.