Peer Review reports
From: Re-interpreting conventional interval estimates taking into account bias and extra-variation
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeremy Miles |
| 22 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Timothy Lash |
| 9 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Höfler |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Timothy Lash |
| 11 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Höfler |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Höfler |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Oct 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Oct 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-51 |
You can find further information about peer review here.