Peer Review reports
From: CUSUM: A tool for early feedback about performance?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson |
| 31 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johann Steurer |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 19 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Winston Chang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Winston Chang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson |
| 3 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johann Steurer |
| 16 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Winston Chang |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 16 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 31 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson |
| 16 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Winston Chang |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 16 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.