Peer Review reports
From: Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 16 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Maher |
| 17 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jørgen Hilden |
| 30 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shriprakash Kalantri |
| 5 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shriprakash Kalantri |
| 12 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jørgen Hilden |
| 4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.