Peer Review reports
From: Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic |
| 5 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Schriger |
| 7 Nov 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Shashok |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Nov 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic |
| 12 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Schriger |
| 27 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Shashok |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Shashok |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 Jan 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Jan 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.