Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 May 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David J Torgerson |
29 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet |
9 Jul 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl |
10 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Antony Desborough |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David J Torgerson |
22 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet |
7 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl |
11 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Antony Desborough |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David J Torgerson |
18 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - James Antony Desborough |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - James Antony Desborough |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
1 May 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - James Antony Desborough |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
1 May 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
27 Jun 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Jun 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.