Peer Review reports
From: A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 5 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Behrens |
| 16 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd |
| 23 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Leigh Blizzard |
| 20 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Behrens |
| 21 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Leigh Blizzard |
| 6 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Feb 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Feb 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.