Skip to main content

Archived Comments for: Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine

Back to article

  1. Previous IPD diagnostic and prognostic reviews

    Bob Phillips, University of York

    17 March 2010

    Diagnostic tests and prognostic variables have been subject to previous IPD meta-analysis. Some of these include:

    Royston, P., M.K. Parmar, and R. Sylvester, Construction and validation of a prognostic model across several studies, with an application in superficial bladder cancer. Stat Med, 2004. 23(6): p. 907-26.

    Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration, Plasma Fibrinogen Level and the Risk of Major Cardiovascular Diseases and Nonvascular Mortality: An Individual Participant Meta-analysis. JAMA, 2005. 294(14): p. 1799-1809.

    Trivella, M., et al., Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol, 2007. 8(6): p. 488-99.

    Mant, J., et al., Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnosis of heart failure, with modelling of implications of different diagnostic strategies in primary care. Health Technol Assess, 2009. 13(32): p. 1-207, iii.

    Further development of the methods, as well as dissemination of the results of the planned reviews, remains essential however.

    Competing interests